What is the Coherence Principle and its main constraints/criteria?
The idea behind the Coherence Principle is that all lesson material should relate closely to stated lesson objectives and goals. This means that lesson materials should be devoid of extra or additional material added for the sole purpose of making the lesson more appealing to the visual, listening and/or reading audience. Studies indicate that learning happens more efficiently in the absence of extraneous background noises/music, graphics and even words. Common sense tells us that extraneous material increases distractibility, and the research indicates that added, irrelevant information overloads neural channels, especially given that humans have been shown to have limited capabilities in short-term processing when responding to visual and/or auditory stimula (Mayer, 1999). The studies are limited however, to controlled experiments under closed conditions with novice and usually older (university-level) learners. More research in conditions other than those just cited is needed.
Describe one example of successful inclusion of the Coherence Principle that I have experienced in my own instruction; also describe one unsuccessful attempt.
As I have mentioned before, I host a YouTube channel devoted to lessons involving various topics from AP and IB Economics. Models and graphs being fairly fundamental to the study of economics and the analysis of economic phenomena, almost all of my videos include a demonstration and explanation of a graph or economic model. The graphs are a positive example of the application of the Coherence Principle with respect to the inclusion of graphic images and narration.
I can recall a time however, when PowerPoint was a relatively "new toy" (and the world was young), that I used every audio bell and whistle (and typewriter audio clip) in my PPT presentations. I believed that the inclusion of such material kept my audience on their toes; quite the opposite seems to be the case.
Have you ever seen this principle violated or abused. Use citations from the text as necessary.
Although the authors of our text no doubt intended it, they included an irresistible graphic about two morbidly obese people as an example of interesting but irrelevant information (Clark & Mayer, 2008, p. 160). After seeing the graphic, I spent the better part of the next hour Googling "John Minnoch" and "Carol Yager," the two obese individuals cited in the text, thus proving the authors' point that irrelevant information impedes the learning process. Quite a few of the textbooks used in various middle school courses, if I recall, abuse this principle. A staggering number of websites do as well.
Discuss the relationship between the Coherence Principle and the other multimedia learning principles that have been thus far examined.
The Coherence Principle (CP) is very much related to the Multimedia and Contiguity principles in that the underlying assumption behind the CP is that multimedia is indeed being used. It extends the Multimedia Principle in stating quite clearly that the multimedia being used must be directly related to learning goals and objectives. In combining the CP with the Contiguity Principle, we conclude that contiguous multimedia elements must be highly related to one another.
The CP is also closely related to both the Modality and Redundancy principles. The Modality Principle suggests to us that audio narration is often more effective than on-screen text. The CP acts as a corollary here; the Modality Principle's narration must be directly related to learning goals and objectives. The Redundancy Principle new seems as a very specific example of the CP. When visuals are explained with BOTH printed words and narration, we have both redundancy and a violation of the CP. This is generally viewed as not a good thing.
Discuss the Coherence Principle to the fundamental theories of psychology as described by Clark & Mayer in the text.
The biggest of psychology's "fundamental" theories that the authors take to task is the so-called "Arousal Theory," the idea that learners' interests must be piqued before learning can take place. The authors draw a distinction between having one's curiosity and interest stimulated by information relevant to learning and then irrelevant to learning, and so they agree with and disagree with some of the the tenets of this theory. They even quote Dewey, who seems to have been en early skeptic about the blanket application of the Arousal Theory (was the anything about which Dewey was not correct?!). Most of the CP seems to fit well with contemporary learning theory, especially the ideas of mental schemas and the human need to fit newly acquired information into an existing mental schema.
In another of our readings this week, Moreno and Mayer (2000) discuss the excellent fit among multimedia theory (of which the Coherence Principle is a part) with the dual processing theory (discussed above in question # 1) the cognitive load theory (discussed briefly in question # 1) and a contructivist learning theory where tudents actively create meaning by interacting with their surrounding environment.
What do I personally like or dislike about this principle? Explain.
Extremely wordy or flowery explanations in any field of study have always troubled me. When I first earned my undergrad degree in education ( a long time ago), the field of study seemed to be absolutely laced with jargon backed by study after tedious study. Case in point: Madeleine Hunter's "anticipatory set" was just a misnomer for the "hook" used by journalists for years and years. Could Madeleine not have just used the term, "hook"? I found a lot of the jargon to be misnomers, and I thought that many of the studies could have been much more succinctly explained. This is what I like about the CP. It seems to indicate to us the importance of getting straight to the point and to avoid obfuscating seemingly simple concepts with flowery or highly technical phrases.
Are there any limitations or caveats about this principle that the authors did not consider. if so, what are they?
To me the biggest drawback to the CP is the research backing it. Although the indications are there and seem to be quite strong, I still have questions about applying the principle to all ages of learners. Does the principle hold up as well for very young learners as it seems to do with university-level learners? This is not a caveat per se, but it seems to me that this is an area of educational application that is ripe for further study.
References
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2008).
E-learning and the science of instruction, 2nd edition. Pfeiffer: San Francisco, CA.
Mayer, R. E. (1999). Multimedia aids to problem-solving transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(7), 611-623.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A learner-centered approach to multimedia explanations: Deriving instructional design principles from cognitive theory. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 2(2), 2004-07.